Vijendra Singh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The application under Section 482 was dismissed for want of prosecution as no representative appeared even after revised call. The interim order was vacated.
The application under Section 482 was dismissed for want of prosecution as no representative appeared even after revised call. The interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 20409 of 2011
Applicant :- Vijendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
None appears on behalf of applicant even in revised call.
In view of above, the application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 25.11.2022 Nirmal Sinha
Digitally signed by NIRMAL SINHA Date: 2022.11.25 16:48:04 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijendra Singh
State of U.P.
Another
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Nirmal Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court