In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court rejected the applicant's request to quash specific criminal proceedings and an impugned order, finding no legal infirmity justifying interference.
Prayer for quashing the entire proceedings and the impugned order is refused and the petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 20339 of 2022
Applicant :- Dev Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dheeraj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed praying for quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Revision No. 87 of 2022 (Shivalik Small Finance Bank Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and another), under Section 420, 406 I.P.C., pending before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.7, Ghaziabad as well as to quash the impugned order dated 08.06.2022 passed in the aforesaid case.
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the order impugned, this Court is of the opinion, that learned counsel for the applicant could not point out any legal infirmity in the order which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of powers conferred under 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the prayer for quashing the impugned order is refused.
The instant petition lacks merit and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 2.8.2022 Abhishek Singh
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SINGH Date: 2022.08.03 17:58:50 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings and an impugned order.
Whether the impugned order bears any legal infirmity warranting interference under the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DEV SHARMA
STATE OF U.P.
HON'BLE GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
ABHISHEK SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
