Ajay Gautam v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 of CrPC as infructuous due to the lapse of time without assigning substantive legal grounds.
The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 of CrPC as infructuous due to the lapse of time without assigning substantive legal grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1996 of 2015
Applicant :- Ajay Gautam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- B.N. Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Case taken up in the revise call.
None for the applicant.
Applicant was filed this application against the order of interim maintenance.
It appears that due to lapse of time, the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the case is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 30.11.2022 C. MANI
Digitally signed by CHANDRAMANI VERMA Date: 2022.11.30 16:36:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajay Gautam
State of U.P.
Another
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court