Disposed¶8

Monu and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC6 Apr 2022A482/1995/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 CrPC quashing petition disposed of with liberty to seek bail; Allahabad High Court, Manish Kumar J., 6.4.2022; Appn. U/S 482 No. 1995 of 2022; Monu and 3 others v. State of U.P.; charge sheet 14.05.2017; cognizance order 16.05.2018; Case No.817 of 2018; Case Crime No.395 of 2017; Sections 323, 504, 506, 279, 337 IPC; P.S. Khurja Nagar, District Bulandshahar; bail application to be decided within ten days per Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, SLP (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 (order dated 7.10.2021); A.G.A. no objection; no adjudication on merits of quashing.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners/applicants to move a bail application before the trial court within fifteen days, to be decided within ten days thereafter in view of Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (supra); petition disposed of accordingly. ¶8

Monu and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Court No. - 92 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1995 of 2022 Applicant :- Monu And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Kumar Mishra,Smt. Mandvee Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners/ applicants and learned counsel for the opposite parties as well as perused the record.

¶4

The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 14.05.2017 alongwith cognizance order dated 16.05.2018 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Khurja Nagar, Bulandshahar as well as entire criminal proceeding of Case No.817 of 2018, arising out of Case Crime No.395 of 2017, under Section 323, 504, 506, 279, 337 I.P.C., P.S. - Khurja Nagar, District - Bulandshahar, pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khurja Nagar, Bulandshahar.

¶5

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners/ applicants submits that a liberty may be given to the petitioners/ applicants to file bail application before the learned trial court and the same may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court in order dated 7.10.2021 passed in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another.

¶6

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners/ applicants.

¶7

As prayed by the learned counsel for the applicants / petitioners', it is provided that in case, the petitioners move bail application before the trial court within fifteen days' from today, the same shall be decided within a period of ten days thereafter, in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (supra).

¶8

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶9

Order Date :- 6.4.2022/S. Kumar

¶10

Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR Date: 2022.04.06 18:17:14 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Monu and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Monu and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sesh Narayan and Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shri Ram Dubey @ Shri Ram Lallan Dubey Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Habib Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mustfa Vs State of U.P. and Another

Babu Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Abdul Gaffar Vs State of U.P. and Another