Allowed

Juganu v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Allahabad HC30 Mar 2022A482/1942/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order in an application under Section 482 CrPC held that the magistrate's order dispensing with service of summons via domicile coat was illegal and arbitrary. The summons lacked reasonable opportunity to defend, rendering it unsustainable.

What did the court decide?

The writ requiring the allegations in the order against the magistrate's order dispensing with summons service was dated 24-8-2017 and the summons order dated 12-11-2021 was quashed.

Juganu Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 86

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1942 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Juganu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Manvendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] okn la0 12@1975 Mh 201702250725 lu 2017] vUrxZr /kkjk 145 na0iz0la0] Fkkuk dksrokyh lnj] ftyk Qrsgiqj esa ,fM’kuy lc fMohtuy eftLVzsV] Qrsgiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 24&8&2017 ,oa nkf.Md fuxjkuh la0 129 lu 2017 esa ,fM’kuy ls’kUl tt] ,Q0Vh0lh0] dksVZ ua0 1] Qrsgiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 12&11&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd iz’uxr vkns’k fn0 24&8&2017 }kjk fo}ku vij mi ftyk eftLVzsV us dqdZ’kqnk lEifRr dks lqjs’k flag ;kno dh lqiqnZxh ls eqDr djus esa fof/kd =qfV dh] ftlds fo:) vkosnd dh vksj ls nkf.Md fuxjkuh nk;j dh x;h] ftls fo}ku ,fM’kuy ls’kUl tt] ,Q0Vh0lh0] dksVZ ua0 1] Qrsgiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 12&11&2021 }kjk fujLr dj fn;k x;kA bl izdkj iz’uxr vkns’k =qfViw.kZ gS ,oa vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us muds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k fd;kA

¶9

eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa iz’uxr vkns’k dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶10

fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ij vk/kkfjr gS] ldkj.k vkns’k gSa rFkk lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k mfpr gSa] mlesa dksbZ lkjoku vfu;ferrk ;k vukSfpR;rk ;k dksbZ izfdz;k ;k {ks=kf/kdkj laca/kh =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gSA vr% iz’uxr vkns’k dks vikLr djus lacaf/kr vkosnd dh izkFkZuk fujLr fd, tkus rFkk iz'uxr vkns'k iq"V fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶11

rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ,fM’kuy lc fMohtuy eftLVzsV] Qrsgiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 24&8&2017 ,oa nkf.Md fuxjkuh la0 129 lu 2017 esa ,fM’kuy ls’kUl tt] ,Q0Vh0lh0] dksVZ ua0 1] Qrsgiqj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 12&11&2021 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA

¶12

dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf’pr fd;k tk;A fn0 % 30&3&2022

¶13

ds0lh0flag

¶14

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.03.30 19:04:48 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Juganu v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Juganu v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akshay Saini and 2 Others Vs State of Uttar Pradesh through Its Principal Secretary Home and Another

Satish Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vishnu Bhagwan Director M/S M.S. Trade Link Pravate Limited Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shree Devi and Another Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Anurag and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Nikhil Soni and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another