In this CrPC 482 application to quash a non-bailable warrant, the High Court did not decide merits but directed the applicant to approach the trial court for bail within 15 days. The court relied on Satender Kumar Antil and Brahm Singh to ensure disposal in view of settled law.
Direction to applicant to seek bail before the trial court within 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18923 of 2022
Applicant :- Anil Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash Tripathi,J.
Order Date :- 22.7.2022 SFH
Digitally signed by SYED FAHIM HUSAIN Date: 2022.07.22 17:16:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application to quash the non-bailable warrant should be disposed of by directing the applicant to seek bail before the court below.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
Brahm Singh and others vs. State of UP and othersReferred¶8
Brahm Singh and others vs. State of UP and others, 2016 (95) ACC 950
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Kumar
State of U.P.
Om Prakash Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
