opposite party no.2, the wife, is residing separately and applicant still wants to live with his wife and his minor daughter. He further submitted that the court below awarded interim maintenance from the date of the application moved for interim maintenance and not from the date of the order and, therefore, there is illegality in the order dated 24.5.2022. He further submitted that opposite party no.2 is having sufficient means to maintain herself and her minor daughter but in spite of that she claimed maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and during the pendency of the application, she filed an application for interim maintenance which was allowed. He further submitted that applicant is not having enough earning to give interim maintenance allowance of Rs. 3000/- per month to opposite parties no.2 and 3 but the court below without considering these facts passed the impugned order dated 24.5.2022 which is illegal. Per contra, learned AGA submitted that applicant is the husband of opposite party no.2 and opposite party no.3 is his minor daughter and as he failed to maintain them, therefore, opposite party no.2, the wife moved an application under
