Devendra Singh Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others — Allahabad HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

Devendra Singh Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others — Allahabad HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. allowed without notice to opposite party no. 2; Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur directed to dispose of the applicant's protest petition dated 11-06-2018 (against final report No. 1138 of 2018) within 60 days after hearing the parties and completely perusing the record, uninfluenced by any observation in the order; office to send a copy of the order to the trial court without delay.

Issue for consideration

Whether the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur ought to be directed to decide expeditiously the protest petition dated 11-06-2018 filed by the applicant against the final report arising out of Case Crime No. 426 of 2016 (Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Kotwali, Gorakhpur)

Court's answer

The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed/accepted without issuing notice to opposite party no. 2.

Ratio / Principle

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur is directed to decide the applicant's protest petition dated 11-06-2018 against final report No. 1138 of 2018 (Case Crime No. 426 of 2016, Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Kotwali, district Gorakhpur) within 60 days, after affording the parties proper opportunity of hearing and after complete perusal of the record, without being influenced by the merits or demerits of any observation recorded in the order.

Key takeaways

The office is directed to ensure transmission of a copy of the order to the court concerned with the trial without delay.ratio¶9

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Gautam Chowdhary, J., 19.07.2022), Application U/S 482 No. 17007 of 2022, Devendra Singh v. State of U.P. and 6 others — Allowed, without issuing notice to opposite party no. 2. The applicant, the first informant in Case Crime No. 426 of 2016 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Kotwali, district Gorakhpur, aggrieved by final report No. 1138 of 2018 submitted to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur, had filed a protest petition dated 11-06-2018 which remained undecided. The Court directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur to decide the protest petition within 60 days after affording the parties proper opportunity of hearing and complete perusal of the record, without being influenced by any observation made in the order, and directed the office to transmit a copy of the order to the trial court without delay.

Court No. - 83

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17007 of 2022

Applicant :- Devendra Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Adya Prasad Tewari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 426 lu 2016] vUrxZr /kkjk 419] 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk dSUV] ftyk xksj[kiqj esa izsf"kr vfUre vk[;k la0 1138 lu 2018] nsosUnz flag olsZl gjfoUnj flag esa eq[; U;kf;d eftLVzsV] xksj[kiqj dks ;g funsZf’kr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd vkosnd ds izksVsLV fiVh’ku fnukafdr 11&6&2018 ij mfpr fu.kZ; 'kh/kzrk ds vk/kkj ij ysaA

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd us lacaf/kr Fkkus ij foi{khx.k ds fo:) ,d izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ eq0v0la0 426 lu 2016] vUrxZr /kkjk 419] 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkk0na0fo0 vafdr djk;h] fdUrq lacaf/kr Fkkus dh iqfyl }kjk mldh fu"i{k foospuk ugha dh x;h vkSj blesa eq[; U;kf;d eftLVzsV] xksj[kiqj ds U;k;ky; esa vfUre vk[;k yxk nh x;h] ftl ij voj U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnd dks uksfVl tkjh dh x;h] vkosnd us U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksdj fn0 11&6&2018 dks izksVsLV fiVh’ku nkf[ky fd;k] ftldk fuLrkj.k lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk vHkh rd ugha fd;k x;k gSA

ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr nk;j ;g vkosnu i= vaxhdj.k ds Lrj ij gh] fcuk foi{kh la0 2 dks uksfVl tkjh fd, gq,] Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk eq[; U;kf;d eftLVzsV] xksj[kiqj dks funsZf’kr fd;k tkrk gS fd eq0v0la0 426 lu 2016] vUrxZr /kkjk 419] 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk dSUV] ftyk xksj[kiqj esa izsf"kr vfUre vk[;k la0 1138 lu 2018 ds fo:) vkosnd dh vksj ls nk;j izksVsLV fiVh’ku fnukafdr 11&6&2018 dk fuLrkj.k bl vkns’k esa mfYyf[kr fdlh Hkh fVIi.kh ds xq.k&nks"k ls izHkkfor gq, fcuk] i{kdkjksa dks lquokbZ dk leqfpr volj nsrs gq, ,oa i=koyh dk lE;d :is.k voyksdu djus ds mijkUr] 60 fnu ds vUnj dj fn;k tk;A

dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsA

fn0 % 19&7&2022 ds0lh0flag

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.07.20 16:04:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad