Disposed

Keshav Tyagi v. State of U.P.and Another

Allahabad HC22 Jun 2022A482/15386/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The applicant withdrew the challenge to quashing proceedings but sought protection to surrender. The court refused the quashing relief but directed surrender within four weeks and expedited bail consideration.

What did the court decide?

Refused to quash proceedings. Directed applicant to surrender within four weeks. Directed lower courts to decide bail application expeditiously.

Keshav Tyagi Vs State of U.P.and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 44

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15386 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Keshav Tyagi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Suraj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P./opposite party no.1 and perused the record.

¶6

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceedings of Case No.1228 of 2022, arising out of Case Crime No.41 of 2021, under Sections 308, 323, 325, 504 I.P.C., P.S. Khekra, District Baghpat.

¶7

At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant gave up his challenge to the aforesaid entire criminal proceedings against the applicant and confined his submission requesting to grant some protection to the applicant to surrender before the concerned court below. Learned counsel for the applicant further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction may be issued to the concerned courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. submits that in case the applicant is not pressing the relief as sought for by them on merits and want to surrender before the concerned court below, he has no objection.

¶9

In view of the above, the relief as sought by the applicant in the instant application is refused.

¶10

However, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within four weeks from today and in case apply for bail, the bail application of the applicant shall be disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law and keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 22.6.2022 Nitin Verma

¶13

Digitally signed by NITIN KUMAR VERMA Date: 2022.06.23 17:02:45 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Keshav Tyagi v. State of U.P.and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Keshav Tyagi v. State of U.P.and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhiraj Agrawal Vs State of U.P.and Another

Jagdish Singh and Another Vs State of U.P.and Another

Surendra Kumar Pathak and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Panna Lal and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Narayan Dutt Tiwari Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Dharmendra and Another Vs State of U.P and Another