Dismissed
Udayraj v. State of U.P and Another
Allahabad HCA482/1231/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1231 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1231 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1231 of 2022
Applicant :- Udayraj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Bhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
This applicant, through the present application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 11.11.2021 passed by the Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court no. 4, Jaunpur in Case No. 867 of 2020 (Neetu Vs. Udayraj), under section 125 Cr.P.C..
After having heard the learned counsel for the parties present and perused the impugned order as well as material brought on record, I am of the view that impugned order is based upon relevant consideration and supported by cogent reason, the same does not suffer from any irregularity, illegality or jurisdictional error, hence, no interference is required by this Court. The prayer for quashing the impugned order is refused.
The application lacks merit. It is liable to be dismissed and is, accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 4.2.2022
RPD
Udayraj
State Of U.P
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court