In an application under Section 482 CrPC, the Allahabad High Court quashed the proceedings because discovery and conciliation proceedings under Section 147 CrPC had been completed, and the parties expressed a desire for conciliation.
The comprehensive proceedings under the impugned order quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11974 of 2022
Applicant :- Mani Lal And 7 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Lakshmi Kant Pandey,Sunil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosndx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 124 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 323] 504] 506] 308 Hkk0n a 0fo0] Fkkuk Hknksgh] ftyk Hknksgh ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 6784 lu 2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; vkil esa lqyg le>kSrk gks x;k gS rFkk os bl okn dks vkxs ugha pykuk pkgrs gSa] blfy, mijksDr okn dh laiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks vikLr dj fn;k tk;A vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Gian Singh Vs. State
of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675, Narinder Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2014 Law Suit (SC) 202, Yogendra Yadav & Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr, Dimpey Gujral W/o Vivek Gujral & Ors Vs. Union Territory & Ors esa ikfjr uthjksa dh vksj U;k;ky; dk /;ku vkd`"V djk;kA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd i{kdkjksa ds chp gq, le>kSrkukek dks lR;kfir djus gsrq voj U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk voj U;k;ky; dh vk[;k fn0 11&7&2022 ds vuqlkj voj U;k;ky; }kjk le>kSrk rlnhd fd;k tk pqdk gS] tks i=koyh ij miyC/k gSA
mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dks lquus rFkk i=koyh ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; dh mijksdr uthjksa dk ifj'khyu djus ds i’pkr /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr izLrqr fd;k x;k vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk mijksDr of.kZr okn dh laiw.kZ dk;Zokgh vikLr dh tkrh gSA
vUrfje vkns’k ;fn dksbZ gks rks mls lekIr le>k tk;A
dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsA
fn0% 8&12&2022
ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.12.08 16:55:45 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether under Section 482 CrPC the High Court should quash the proceedings against the applicant when discovery and conciliation under Section 147 have taken place and the parties desire conciliation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of PunjabReferred¶7
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333 · Who else cites this
B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of HaryanaReferred¶7
B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 · Who else cites this
Narinder Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab & AnrReferred¶7
Narinder Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab & Anr, 2014 Law Suit (SC) 202
Yogendra Yadav & Ors Vs. State of JharkhandReferred¶7
Yogendra Yadav & Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr
Dimpey Gujral W/o Vivek Gujral & Ors Vs. Union Territory & OrsReferred¶7
Dimpey Gujral W/o Vivek Gujral & Ors Vs. Union Territory & Ors
Mani Lal And 7 Others
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
