Court No. 86 dismissed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear on the hearing date or seek further adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11181 of 2022
Applicant :- Noman Faruki Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Raksha Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears for the petitioner. Learned A.G.A. is present.
Perusal of the order sheet shows that on the first date, time was sought on behalf of the petitioner and on another date, adjournment was prayed for the petitioner. Even today, in the revised list, none responds on behalf of the petitioner.
From the above, it is evident that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case.
The petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 14.9.2022 kkb.
Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL Date: 2022.09.14 16:39:31 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Noman Faruki
Karunesh Singh Pawar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
