A longstanding Section 482 application filed in 2004 was dismissed as infructuous. The hearing proceeded without the applicant or counsel appearing. The court found the petition could not justify any judicial intervention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10884 of 2004
Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gulab Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Case called out in revised list. No one is present on behalf of applicant to press this petition. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The matter is an old one pending since 2004.
It appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the applicant has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for applicant is absent.
However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that the applicant is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 7.4.2022 S.Ali
Digitally signed by SHAUKAT ALI Date: 2022.04.11 16:34:54 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant stay or discharge order on incomplete grounds.
Pradeep Kumar
State of U.P.
Shaakat Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
