In a writ petition under Article 227, the petitioner was absent on the hearing date. The Allahabad High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution without substantive consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6183 of 2022
Petitioner :- Ambuj Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabodh Kumar Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
None responds for the petitioner when the case is called out. However, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Perusal of the order-sheet shows that none responded for the petitioner even on the previous date.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 24.11.2022 Saif
Digitally signed by SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN Date: 2022.11.25 12:06:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ambuj Yadav
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
