This is a matter under Article 227 regarding a petition challenging an interim attachment order. The High Court held that where the lower appellate court refused to review the attachment order under Section 146 NI Act on substantial grounds, the matter is disposed off by dismissing the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 580 of 2022
Petitioner :- Ajeet Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Sengar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
;kph dh vksj ls Hkkjorh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds vUrxZr ;g ;kfpdk] okn la0 0005 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 145 (1) ,oa 145 na0iz0la0] Fkkuk dksrokyh mjbZ] ftyk tkykSu esa fcuk frfFk ds uksfVl] vkns’k fn0 22&9&2020 ,oa nkf.Md fuxjkuh la0 0026 lu 2020 esa ,fM’kuy ls’ku tt] dksVZ ua0 1] tkykSu ,V mjbZ }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 14&12&2021 ds fo:) nk;j dh x;h gSA
;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd mijksDr okn esa uxj eftLVzsV] mjbZ }kjk 'kkafr O;oLFkk Hkax gksus dh laHkkouk dks ns[krs gq, mHk; i{k dks muds U;k;ky; esa Lo;a vFkok vf/koDrk ds ek/;e ls mifLFkr gksdj dCts ds lEcU/k esa viuk viuk i{k@lk{; izLrqr djus dk funsZ’k fn;k x;kA bl izdj.k esa uxj eftLVzsV] mjbZ }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k fn0 22&9&2022 }kjk 'kkfUr Hkax dh lEHkkouk dks ns[krs gq, mHk; i{kksa ds lk{; dCts ds lEcU/k esa ysus gsrq frfFk fu;r dh x;h rFkk nkf.Md fuxjkuh la0 26 lu 20210 esa fo}ku vij l= U;k;k/kh’k] dksVZ ua0 1] tkykSu LFkku mjbZ }kjk fuxjkuh fujLr dh x;h] ftuls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph dh vksj ls bl U;k;ky; esa ;g ;kfpdk nk;j dh x;h gSA
i=koyh ij fo|eku iz’uxr vkns’kksa dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA fo}ku uxj eftLVzsV }kjk iz’uxr vkns’k /kkjk 146 (1) na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA mDr /kkjk 146 (1) na0iz0la0 fuEuor~ gS %&
“Provided that such Magistrate may withdraw the
attachment at any time if he is satisfied that there is no longer any likelihood of breach of the peace with regard to the subject of dispute.”
fo}ku uxj eftLVzsV] }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k fcYdqy lgh ,oa mfpr gS] mlesa fdlh izdkj dh =qfV ugha gS] rFkk nkf.Md fuxjkuh la0 26 lu 2020 esa vij l= U;k;k/kh’k] dksVZ ua0 1] tkykSu LFkku mjbZ }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 14&12&2021 vikLr fd;k tkrk gSA
fo}ku uxj eftLVzsV }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k }kjk i{kdkjksa dks U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj viuk viuk lk{;@tokc izLrqr djus dk volj Hkh fn;k x;k gS] fdUrq tSlk fd ;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vHkh okn dk fuLrkj.k xq.k nks"k ds vk/kkj ij ugha fd;k x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;fn uxj eftLVzsV] mjbZ }kjk mDr okn dk fuLrkj.k xq.k nks"k ds vk/kkj ij vfUre :i ls fd;k tkrk gS vkSj ;fn ;kph mDr vkns’k ls larq"V ugha gksrs gSa rks os lacaf/kr eftLVzsV
ds le{k mlds fujlu gsrq vkosnu i= izLrqr dj ldrs gSa rFkk /kkjk 146 na0iz0la0 Lo;a izkfo/kfur djrk gS fd /kkjk 145 (1) na0iz0la0 ds rgr ikfjr dksbZ vkns’k eftLVzsV }kjk iw.kZ larqf"V ds ckn okil fy;k tk ldrk gSA vr% ;fn bl vk’k; dk vkosnu i= izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks lacaf/kr eftLVzsV }kjk mlij leqfpr lquokbZ dh tk,xh vkSj mldk fuLrkj.k fu;ekuqlkj 'kh/kzrkiwoZd fd;k tk;A
bl leqfDr ds lkFk ;g ;kfpdk vkaf’kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA fn0 % 25&3&2022 ds0lh0flag
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed given the order below was refused to be reviewed by the District Judge.
Ajeet Singh
State of U.P. and Another
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
