The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in a matter under Article 227, observed that a restoration application had already been decided by the Civil Judge, Bhadohi, and directed that no further order was needed, consigning the matter to record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2774 of 2022
Petitioner :- Deena Nath Singh Respondent :- Lakshman And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Kumar,Santosh Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
Perused the order dated 26.05.2022, submitted by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)/FTC, Bhadohi at Gyanpur. A perusal of the report shows that the Restoration Application No.6 of 2011 has been decided.
In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be made in this petition. It is consigned to record .
Let this order be communicated to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)/FTC, Bhadohi at Gyanpur through the learned District Judge, Bhadohi at Gyanpur by the office by Monday, without fail .
Order Date :- 27.5.2022 NSC
Digitally signed by NARENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY Date: 2022.05.28 15:01:45 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Deena Nath Singh
Lakshman
5 Others
Munir
Narendra Singh Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
