The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous as the prayed relief was already granted by the court below. The petition was accordingly dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2445 of 2022
Petitioner :- Randheer Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Adya Prasad Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Sri Adya Prasad Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he does not want to press this writ petition as the prayer sought by the petitioners have already been afforded to them and, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 8.4.2022 Vikram
Digitally signed by VIKRAM SINGH Date: 2022.04.21 19:33:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Randheer Singh And 3 Others
State of U.P. and Another
Rahul Chaturvedi
Vikram Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
