Under Article 227, this writ court discharged the petitioner from the trial in the offence of 2721. It allowed the petitioner to be discharged at the CC stage as per Section 451 CrPC.
PWA discharged from the trial stage for the offence of 2721, but discharged order is not allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1446 of 2022
Petitioner :- Yograj Alias Diwan Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Azm Sayeed,Khalid Mahmood Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
;kph dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk] eq0v0la0 85 lu 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 63@71 vkcdkjh vf/k0] Fkkuk ckySuh] ftyk ckxir esa lh0ts0,e0] ckxir }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 13&9&2021 ,oa nkf.Md fuxjkuh la0 72 lu 2021 esa l= U;k;k/kh’k] ckxir }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 3&12&2021 ds fo:) nk;j dh x;h gSA
;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj'khyu
fd;kA
;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd ;kph iz’uxr okgu la0 ,pvkj&26 chds&7231 dk iathdr Lokeh gS] bl okgu dks ;kph ds i{k esa voeqDr djus dk vkosnu i= fn;k x;k Fkk] ftls fd fo}ku lh0ts0,e0] ckxir }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 13&9&2021 }kjk fujLr dj fn;k x;k gSA bl vkns’k ds fo:) ;kph dh vksj ls nkf.Md fuxjkuh la0 72 lu 2021 nk;j dh x;h] ;g fuxjkuh Hkh fo}ku l= U;k;k/kh’k] ckxir ds vkns’k fn0 3&12&2021 }kjk fujLr dj nh x;h] tcfd bls ;kph ds i{k esa eqDr fd;k tkuk vko’;d gSA vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujrat 2002 (10) SCC 283. ,oa Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai and C.M. Mudaliar Vs. State of Gujrat, AIR 2003 SC 638 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; izfrikfnr fof/k O;oLFkk ,oa CRM-M- 46869 - 2019 (O&M).Tej Singh vs. State of Haryana esa mPp U;k;ky; pUMhx<+ }kjk izfrikfnr fof/k O;oLFkk ,oa vU; cgqr lh fof/k O;oLFkkvksa dh vksj U;k;ky; dk /;ku vkd"V fd;k] ftuesa ;g vo/kkfjr fd;k x;k gS fd iqfyl }kjk tks Hkh okgu tCr fd, tkrs gSa] mUgsa l= ijh{k.k ds nkSjku ,oa l= ijh{k.k ds fuLrkj.k ds le; /kkjk 451 na0iz0la0 esa izfrikfnr fof/k ds vuqlkj okgu Lokeh ds i{k esa voeqDr fd;k tk ldrk gSA
;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa mijksDr fof/k O;oLFkkvksa ds en~nsutj ;g ;khpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk mijksDr okn esa ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k fn0 13&9&2021 ,oa 3&12&2021 vikLr fd, tkrs gSa ,oa lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZf’kr fd;k tkrk gS fd iz’uxr okgu dks mlds Lokeh ds i{k esa fu;ekuqlkj vko’;d izi= izLrqr djus ij] voeqDr dj fn;k tk;A
dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsA fn0 % 30&5&2022 ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.05.30 15:47:03 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an accused can be discharged from the stages of CC in its LOKYA in a case of indeterminate pending.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of GujratReferred¶8
(2002) 10 SCC 283 · Who else cites this
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai and C.M. Mudaliar Vs. State of GujratReferred¶8
AIR 2003 SC 638 · Who else cites this
Tej Singh vs. State of HaryanaReferred¶8
Tej Singh vs. State of Haryana
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Yograj Alias Diwan
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
