Single-line order dismissing a writ petition as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. The petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition which had been previously dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9447 of 2022
Petitioner :- Ravi Chandra And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj, U.P. Lko. And 6 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Adarsh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey,Sandeep Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that certain facts and documents are left to be mentioned and enclosed respectively in the present writ petition so the petitioner may be directed to withdraw the present writ petition as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
As prayed, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
Order Date :- 23.12.2022 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ravi Chandra And 5 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj, U.P. And 6 Others
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
