A PIL challenging the non-renewal of service or related issues was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 865 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sadashiv Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief/Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Edu. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Moti Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shivam Sharma
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Shivam Sharma, learned counsel for Basic Shiksha Parishad, Raebareli.
On being pointed out that the respondent no.10 has already retired from the service of Basic Shiksha Parishad, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 8.12.2022 Renu/-
Digitally signed by RENU AGARWAL Date: 2022.12.09 10:15:20 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sadashiv Pandey
State Of U.P.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
