Allowed

Ajit Pandey @ Veeru Pandey and Another v. State of U.P Thru. Addi. Chief Secy. and Anothers

Allahabad HC2 Mar 2022/845/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of criminal proceedings. The court accepted a compromise between parties, directed verification before the trial court, ordered proceedings to remain in abeyance, and permitted the applicants to approach the court again if verification fails.

What did the court decide?

Impugned proceedings quashed for one month pending verification of compromise by the trial court.

Ajit Pandey @ Veeru Pandey and Another Vs State of U.P… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 13

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 845 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Ajit Pandey @ Veeru Pandey And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Addi. Chief Secy. And Anothers Counsel for Applicant :- Ajai Pratap Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A., K.S. Singh

¶4

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. K.S. Singh learned counsel for respondent No.2 who filed vakalatnama today in court which is taken on record, as also learned A.G.A., and perused the record.

¶6

The instant petition has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the proceedings of Case No. 17412 of 2020 State versus Veeru Pandey and others, pending before the Judicial Magistrate-II, Lucknow including the impugned charge-sheet dated 1.6.2017 filed in case crime No.163 of 2017.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved outside the court by way of compromise which is on record. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 concedes that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties.

¶8

Learned A.G.A has no objection in case the impugned proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise, subject to its verification by the concerned court.

¶9

Accordingly, having due regard to the submissions made by the parties' counsel, perusal of the compromise as also considering the law laid down by Supreme Court in (2012)10 SCC 303 Gian Singh versus State of Punjab and another, the petition is disposed of with direction to the parties to appear before the trial court on 25.3.2022, which shall verify the compromise in presence of the parties within the next one week. The trial court shall provide a copy of the verification report to the parties. A copy of compromise be placed on record of the trial court. It will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶10

For a period of one month, impugned proceedings shall remain in abeyance.

¶11

Order Date :- 2.3.2022/kkb/

¶12

Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL Date: 2022.03.03 09:44:36 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ajit Pandey @ Veeru Pandey and Another v. State of U.P Thru. Addi. Chief Secy. and Anothers

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Pandey @ Veeru Pandey and Another v. State of U.P Thru. Addi. Chief Secy. and Anothers

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankul Kumar (Minor)through His Father Asharam Vs state of u.p.thu prin.sec.home civil sec.lko and others

Vipin Kumar @ Ankush Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home. Lko and Another

Rameshwar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home. Lko and Another

Ruchir Singh Sisodia and Anr. Vs the State of U.P and Anr.

Rajesh Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ajaya Bharti Others Vs State of U.P. and Another