Disposed¶10

Saroj Giri and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC31 May 2022/812/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC (Case Crime No. 0221 of 2021, Sections 406, 420, 506, 120-B IPC, P.S. Bakshi Ka Talab, Lucknow) withdrawn; surrender within one month directed; regular bail to be considered per Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2021 SCC Online SC 922, order dated 07.10.2021) guidelines; interim no-coercive-action protection till surrender; disposed of by Krishan Pahal, J., Allahabad HC Lucknow Bench, 31.5.2022.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application; applicants directed to surrender within one month; regular bail to be decided per the guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil (order dated 07.10.2021); interim protection - no coercive action for one month or till surrender, whichever is earlier. ¶10

Saroj Giri and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 28

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 812 of 2022 Applicant :- Saroj Giri And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Kamlesh Singh,Manjusha Kapil Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶4

Heard Smt. Manjusha Kapil, learned counsel for applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶5

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to 0221 of 2021, under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Bakshi Ka Talab, District Lucknow.

¶6

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922 .

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶8

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court vide order dated 07.10.2021 passed in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶9

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants, in the above case.

¶10

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of .

¶11

Order Date :- 31.5.2022 Ravi Kant

¶12

Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.05.31 17:36:49 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Saroj Giri and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saroj Giri and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar alias Lalla Vs State of U.P. through its Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department

Deepak Yadava Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Amit Pandey @ Pintu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Ameerchand Rana Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Mohd Saif (Second Bail ) Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko

Ramveer Singh Vs State of Up Thru.Prin.Secy.Home