Disposed

Jagdish Maurya and Other v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Depart. of Home and Others

Allahabad HC25 Feb 2022/780/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed parties to appear in the trial court to verify a post-facto compromise deed within one week. Pending verification, criminal proceedings were kept in abeyance for one month. The applicant was granted liberty to return for quashing upon verification.

What did the court decide?

Parties directed to appear before trial court to verify compromise deed; criminal proceedings stayed for one month; liberty granted to re-approach for quashing after verification.

Jagdish Maurya and Other Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 13 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 780 of 2022 Applicant :- Jagdish Maurya And Other Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Depart. Of Home And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Surya Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Dharmendra Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 to 5 who has filed vakalatnama which is taken on record.

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have entered into compromise and have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court. It is further submitted that since the dispute has been settled outside the Court by the parties, the compromise may by verified by the competent authority and thereafter the proceedings impugned be quashed in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of "Prathvi Raj Chauhan Vs. Union of India" reported in "2020(4) SCC 727" .

¶5

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners subject to the fact that the compromise is verified by the competent Court.

¶6

In view of the above the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial court along with the copy of original compromise deed on 14.03.2022, who shall verify the compromise in presence of the parties within one week thereafter and keep a report of the verification on the record of the Court after providing its copies to the parties.

¶7

For a period of one month, the proceedings of criminal case No. 83/2014, arising out of case crime No. 141/2013, under Sections 323/325/452/504/506/427 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(X) of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Jaitpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, shall be kept in abeyance.

¶8

In view of the above, the petition is disposed of.

¶9

Liberty to the parties is granted to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings on the basis of compromise and its verification.

¶10

Order Date :- 25.2.2022 R.C.

¶11

Digitally signed by RAM CHANDER YADAV Date: 2022.03.03 09:41:49 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Jagdish Maurya and Other v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Depart. of Home and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Maurya and Other v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Depart. of Home and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushil Kumar Gupta Alias Susil Vs State of U.P. Thro. Addi. Chief Secy. Dep. Home, Civil Sect. Lko and Anothers

Girish Chandra Srivastava Vs District and Session Judge Faizabad and Another

Jagnarain Sharma and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. D.I.G./ S.P. Lucknow

Ankul Kumar (Minor)through His Father Asharam Vs state of u.p.thu prin.sec.home civil sec.lko and others

Vipin Kumar @ Ankush Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home. Lko and Another

Rameshwar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home. Lko and Another