No petitioner counsel appeared and no adjournment was sought. The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6991 of 2022
Petitioner :- Ved Prakash
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 7 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
List has been revised.
None is present on behalf of the petitioner; neither is there any application for adjournment.
On the other hand, learned State Counsel and learned counsel representing the Gaon Sabha Sri Mohan Singh are present.
Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
( Saurabh Srivastava, J. ) ( Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, J. )
Order Date :- 11.10.2022 A.Nigam
Digitally signed by ANUJ NIGAM Date: 2022.10.14 11:09:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ved Prakash
State Of U.P.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
