This criminal revision against a rejection of an application to recall an ex-parte maintenance order was dismissed. The Court found no error of law or jurisdiction since the applicant failed to participate despite notice.
The criminal revision was dismissed as having no merit and substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 613 of 2022
Revisionist :- Jugesh Shahni @ Yogesh Kumar Shahni Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ram Janak Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 8.7.2022 MVS/-
Digitally signed by MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN Date: 2022.07.11 15:01:00 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court committed any error of law or jurisdiction in rejecting the application under Section 126(2) CrPC to recall the ex-parte maintenance order.
Whether this Court is warranted to interfere with the impugned order awarding meager maintenance.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Jugesh Shahni @ Yogesh Kumar Shahni
State Of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
