Arun Kumar @ Topilal and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. U.P. Lko and Another

Court No. - 10

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4584 of 2022

Applicant :- Arun Kumar @ Topilal And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. U.P. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arjun Kumar Kaushal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) as well as learned Additional Government Advocate, representing respondent no. 1-State, and gone through the record.

¶6

By way of this application under Section 482 CrPC the applicants have prayed for quashing of charge-sheet no.01 dated 21.03.2018 filed in FIR No. 0486 of 2017, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 323, 504, 506 and 354 IPC lodged at Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submits that the applicant(s) want(s) to surrender and apply for regular bail. Only prayer is that while considering the bail application of the applicant(s), trial Court should take into consideration order dated 07.10.2021 read with judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Supreme Court rendered in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors: SLP(Crl) No.5191 of 2021.

¶8

Considering the aforesaid submission, present application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant(s) to surrender before the trial Court within a period of 10 days and apply for regular bail. Trial Court is directed to consider the bail application of the applicant(s) in accordance with law and also take into account the order of the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶9

Order Date :- 16.7.2022 MVS/-

¶10

Digitally signed by MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN Date: 2022.07.16 18:44:19 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Arun Kumar @ Topilal and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. U.P. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Kumar @ Topilal and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. U.P. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Prajapati (Raghav) and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Lko and Others

Mohd.Naushad and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Santhosh Singh Vs State of U.P.

Gireesh Chandra Vs the Prin. Judge Family Court Faizabad and Another

Sabir Ali and Ors. Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Anr.

Annu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Another