Disposed

Vijay Veer Singh and Anr. v. the State of U.P and Anr.

Allahabad HC23 Aug 2022/3638/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings. It directed the applicants to surrender within ten days and apply for regular bail, with consideration of their bail application once they surrender guided by the Supreme Court judgment in Aman Preet Singh.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender within ten days and apply for regular bail, to be considered under Aman Preet Singh.

Vijay Veer Singh and Anr. Vs the State of U.P and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 10

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3638 of 2015

¶3

Applicant :- Vijay Veer Singh And Anr. Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- R.D Shahi,Ram Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate

¶4

Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Rao Narendra Singh, learned AGA.

¶6

Present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of charge sheet no.85 of 2013 as well as the summoning order dated 22.3.2014 and the entire proceedings of Special Case No.4 of 2014, arising out of Case Crime No.1069 of 2011, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters Act, Police Station Hasanganj, District Unnao, pending in the court of Special Judge, Gangsters Act/Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Unnao.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that this application may be disposed of with a direction to the learned Magistrate concerned to consider bail application of the applicants in light of judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.929 of 2021, Aman Preet Singh Vs.

¶8

C.B.I. Through Director.

¶9

I have considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA, representing respondent-State.

¶10

The Supreme Court in Aman Preet Singh (supra) has inter alia held that if a person, who is an accused in a nonbailable/cognizable offence, was not taken into custody during the period of investigation, in such a case, it is appropriate that he may be released on bail as the circumstances of his having

¶11

not been arrested during investigation or not being produced in custody is itself sufficient to entitle him to be released on bail.

¶12

In view of submissions advanced on behalf of the applicants, this application is disposed of with a direction to the applicants to surrender before the trial Court within a period of ten days from today and apply for regular bail and, if the applicants do so, their bail application shall be considered in light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Aman Preet Singh (supra).

¶13

Order Date :- 23.8.2022 Rao/-

¶14

Digitally signed by CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO Date: 2022.08.23 18:17:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vijay Veer Singh and Anr. v. the State of U.P and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Veer Singh and Anr. v. the State of U.P and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Jai Ram and Anr. Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secretary Home

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Mithilesh Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Anil Kumar Tiwari Vs State of U.P. and Ors.

Mohammad Furkan and Ors. Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Anr.

Vasail Ahmad and Ors. Vs the State of U.P and Anr.