Bench allowed bail application of applicant Shahbaaz on grounds of parity with co-accused Gulshad who had already been enlarged on bail. Bail granted subject to conditions regarding presence and conduct during trial.
Released on bail with personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions of presence and conduct during trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3157 of 2022
Applicant :- Shahbaaz @ Lodar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Singh,Aditya Vikram Singh,Istekhaf Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Heard Sri Aditya Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. Mamta Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 695 of 2020, U/S 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 307, 325 IPC & Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh, during the pendency of trial.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused person, Gulshad has already been enlarged on bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.6.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12983 of 2021. The applicant is languishing in jail since 10.3.2021. The criminal history of three cases assigned to the applicant has been explained in para-18 of the affidavit annexed to the bail application. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.
The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However, the aforesaid factual aspects of parity to the co-accused have not been disputed by her.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail on the ground of parity.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Shahbaaz @ Lodar, who is involved in aforementioned case crime number be
released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses.
Order Date :- 6.7.2022
Siddhant
Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SAHU Date: 2022.07.06 17:55:43 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail on the ground of parity with co-accused Atlant.
Shahbaaz @ Lodar
State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home Lucknow
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
