Aasif v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed to direct the trial court to accept a single surety bond for five pending cases. High Court allowed the petition, permitting one personal bond and two sureties to be treated as valid for all five mentioned cases.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed to allow petitioner to furnish one personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties valid for all five mentioned cases.
What the court decided
Court No. - 13
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2348 of 2021
Applicant :- Aasif Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bhupendra Nath Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner to direct the learned Court below, Lucknow not to insist the petitioner to file separate surety bonds in each and every five cases and accept only one surety in lieu of all the five cases.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in five cases by showing the false recovery. The details of the cases are as under:-
- "1. Case Crime No. 87/2019, Under Section-457, 380, 411, I.P.C. Police Station-Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
- Case Crime No. 192/2019 Under Section-457, 380, 411, I.P.C. Police Station-Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
- Case Crime No. 227/2019 Under Section 379, 411, I.P.C. Police Station Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should have directed the trial court to accept only one set of surety bonds for five pending bail cases.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Aasif
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- /2348/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court