Allowed

Ajay Kumar v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home

Allahabad HC15 Feb 2022/23/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to reduce the number of sureties required for bail in seven pending criminal cases, permitting a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000 each.

What did the court decide?

The applicant may furnish a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000 each instead of the required seven sureties in seven cases.

Ajay Kumar Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 13 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 23 of 2022 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Kumar,Atul Chander Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶3

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been released on bail in following cases:-

¶5

(i) Case crime No. 262/2021, under Section 392/411 I.P.C., relating to police station G.R.P. Charbagh, District Lucknow.

¶6

(ii) Case crime No. 310/2021, under Section 380/411 I.P.C., relating to police station G.R.P. Charbagh, District Lucknow.

¶7

(iii) Case crime No. 307/2021, under Section 380/411 I.P.C., relating to police station G.R.P. Charbagh, District Lucknow.

¶8

(iv) Case crime No. 296/2021, under Section 380/411 I.P.C., relating to police station G.R.P. Charbagh, District Lucknow.

¶9

(v) Case crime No. 20/21, under Section 380/411 I.P.C., relating to police station G.R.P. Raibareli, District Raibareli.

¶10

(vi) Case crime No. 314/2021, under Section 411/414 I.P.C., relating to police station G.R.P. Charbagh, District Lucknow.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to poor financial condition, the applicant is not in a position to manage seven (07) sureties of Rs. 50,000/- in all seven cases.

¶12

As such, he seeks the benefit of judgment passed by Hon'be Supreme Court of India in "Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of U.P." passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No. 8914-8915 of 2018.

¶13

Considering the aforesaid, it is provided that the applicant may furnish a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases above mentioned in which the bail orders have been passed.

¶14

With these observations the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.

¶15

Order Date :- 15.2.2022/R.C.

¶16

Digitally signed by RAM CHANDER YADAV Date: 2022.02.17 17:09:16 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ajay Kumar v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kudru @ Amarnath Vs State of U.P. and 3 Ors.

Shiv Kumar @ Shivam Vs State of U.P. and 3 Ors.

Rajjan Ali Nat Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Brijesh Kumar Mishra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Kamal Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Amit Kumar and Others Vs State of U.P. and Another