In a contempt application where the applicant did not appear, the court was informed by the Standing Counsel that the underlying writ order had been complied with, rendering the application infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1726 of 2022
Applicant :- Parashuram Opposite Party :- Shri Jagdish Prasad, Secretary Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Charitra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya)
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case is called out.
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant.
Learned Standing Counsel informs that order of the writ court has already complied with, therefore, the present contempt application lost its efficacy.
Accordingly, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 21.10.2022 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by GAURAV PAL Date: 2022.10.21 18:10:48 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parashuram
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
