Petitioner's criminal revision was dismissed as infructuous because he submitted that parties had compromised and were living separately.
Criminal Revision dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 31
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1375 of 2018
Revisionist :- Awadhesh Srivastava Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Revisionist :- Pankaj Kumar Verma,Surendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Mohd. Aslam,J.
Sri Pankaj Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
In spite of service of notice on 12.01.2019, none present for opposite party No.2.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist (husband) that parties have entered into compromise and living separately, as such, this revision has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.12.2022 Reena/-
Digitally signed by REENA KANNAUJIYA Date: 2022.12.19 16:59:16 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Awadhesh Srivastava
State Of U.P.
Mohd. Aslam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
