Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear despite multiple notices or calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 15
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1124 of 2022
Applicant :- Harishyam Bajpayee Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kripashankar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ambrish Singh Yadav,Amit Jaiswal Ojus Law
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
None appears from the side of applicant even in the revised call, however, Sri Hari Shankar Bajpayee, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Matter relates to S.C./S.C. Act.
Perusal of order sheet reveals that on 15.07.2022 and 25.07.2022, none was present on behalf of applicant and today also none is present to press this application.
In view of the above facts and circumstances, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 26.8.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.08.29 16:33:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harishyam Bajpayee
State Of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
