Ram Samujh Major B.C. v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail cancellation application, the High Court rejected the petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to accused No. 2. The court dismissed the appeal due to the absence of the applicant's counsel and lack of merit in the supporting affidavit.
What did the court decide?
Application for cancellation of bail rejected.
What the court decided
Court No. - 13
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 11034 of 2018
Applicant :- Ram Samujh Major B.C. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Onkar Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List revised. None appears on behalf of applicant to press this bail cancellation application.
Heard Shri Ajay Kumar Singh Tomar, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The applicant, Ram Samujh, has moved the present application seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused/ opposite party No. 2, namely, Nanha @ Arvind Kumar, who was granted bail vide order dated 09.10.2018 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court passed in Bail No. 8553 of 2018, arising out of Case Crime No. 022 of 2018, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 504, 302 I.P.C., Police Station Gosainganj, District Lucknow.
This bail cancellation application is of the year, 2018. On several occasions the learned counsel for the applicant has not turned up to press this bail cancellation application and even today he is not present. It appears that neither the applicant nor his counsel is interested to contest the case, therefore, there is no justification to keep the matter pending and the same deserves to be rejected.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail granted to accused No. 2 in the underlying criminal case should be cancelled based on the appellant's application?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ram Samujh Major B.C.
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- /11034/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court