Chotelal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secrty. Home and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1102 of 2022
Applicant :- Chotelal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secrty. Home And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar,Sanat Singh,Suhail Kashif
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
At the very outset, Sri Arshad, learned Advocate holding brief for Sri Sanat Singh, learned counsel for the applicant has stated that he does not wish to press this application, as the application has become infructuous because the applicant has been arrested, and hence, a prayer has been made that this application be dismissed as not pressed.
Learned AGA, Sri Ajay Kumar Sriavastava, has no objection to the aforesaid request.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 13.7.2022 Shalini
Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.07.13 17:48:04 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Chotelal
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secrty. Home
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court