Mratunjay Sharma v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge rejected bail application of accused charged with dowry harassment and dowry death under IPC 498-A and 304-B, directing speedy trial within one year.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; trial directed to conclude within one year.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Court No. - 14
[ Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10927 of 2020]
Applicant :- Mratunjay Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Shukla,Ramakant Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Alok Kr. Misra,S.K. Pathak
Hon'ble Vikas Kunvar Srivastav,J.
- The case is called out through video conferencing.
- Learned counsel Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate for the bailapplicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State are present through video conferencing in virtual hearing of the case.
- The present bail-application is moved on behalf of accusedapplicant-Mratunjay Sharma who is involved in Case Crime No. 210 of 2020, under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at Police Station Khairi Ghat, District Bahraich.
- The occasion of present bail-application has arisen on rejection of bail-plea of the accused-applicant by learned Sessions Judge, Bahraich vide order dated 23.11.2020.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to accused charged under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC for dowry-related death of wife.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mratunjay Sharma
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vikas Kunvar Srivastav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- /10927/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court