Petitioner withdrew a writ petition after availing alternative remedy, resulting in dismissal of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 759 of 2020
Petitioner :- M/S Tata Projects Limited Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shubham Agrawal,Sanyukta Singh,Sr. Advocate Bharat Ji Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
Ms. Sanyukta Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that she intends to withdraw this petitioner as she has availed the alternative remedy.
Learned Standing Counsel and Sri Manu Girdyal, counsel for the respondent no. 2 have no objection.
In view of the above, this writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 1.2.2021 Saurabh
M/S Tata Projects Limited
State of U.P.
Another
Naheed Ara Moonis
Dinesh Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
