Sri Harihar Prasad v. Union of India and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Ordinances
What did the court decide?
withdrawal application allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn
Ordinances
withdrawal application allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 394 of 2017
Petitioner :- Sri Harihar Prasad Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Mahajan Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I., ,Manu Ghildayal
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
Order on Withdrawal Application No. 5 of 2021 :-
Learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant has moved this withdrawal application along with an affidavit and submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition as the petitioner has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection.
In view of the above, the withdrawal application is allowed.
Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn .
Order Date :- 29.1.2021 VR/
Harihar Prasad
Union Of India
Naheed Ara Moonis
Dinesh Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court