Sultan Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed because the petitioner stated at the outset that he did not wish to press the case.
The writ petition was dismissed because the petitioner stated at the outset that he did not wish to press the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7416 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sultan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Baleshwar Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Sri Arun Kumar Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, states that the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition.
Sri Baleshwar Chaturvedi, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.4 .
In view of above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 12.3.2021 A.Kr.
Sultan Singh
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court