Writ petition seeking allotment of a housing plot was dismissed as infructuous since the allotted plot was confirmed as already allocated to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7330 of 2021
Petitioner :- Parvez Alam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gautam Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anjali Upadhya,Ramendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari,Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
None appears for the petitioner.
Learned counsel Ms. Anjali Upadhyay is appearing for the respondent.
Writ petition has been filed to seek allotment of plot No. B-31 measuring 450 sq.mt.
A counter to the writ petition has been filed though is not on record but learned counsel for the respondent submits that the alternative plot having area of 450 sq.mt. has been allotted to the petitioner, thus, writ petition has become infructuous.
None is there on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition and otherwise looking to the counter and the statement of learned counsel for the respondent, nothing survives now when allotment of plot has been done by the order dated 31st March, 2021.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 4.10.2021 Madhurima
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Munishwar Nath Bhandari, A.C.J.)
Parvez Alam
State Of U.P.
Munishwar Nath Bhandari
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
