A writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn following a preliminary objection regarding the petitioner's maintainability was raised and accepted. The court did not reach the merits.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6334 of 2021
Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girja Shanker Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Sri Girja Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Subhansu Singh, learned Assistant Standing Counsel for respondents.
At the very out set, Sri Subhansu Singh, learned Assistant Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of present writ petition. He submits that petitioner is not a party in the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Therefore, no writ petition can be filed by petitioner for seeking enforcement of order passed under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
When confronted with aforesaid, learned counsel for petitioner could not improve upon the same. He prays to withdraw the writ petition.
Learned Assistant Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.
In view of above, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 28.6.2021 A.Kr.
Rajendra Kumar Tripathi
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
