Nemi Chand and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the petitioners seeking demarcation of ceiling surplus land should institute appropriate proceedings under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, rather than maintain a writ petition, which was thus disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Directing petitioners to institute appropriate proceedings under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for demarcation.