Petitioner sought a license for a retail meat shop. The High Court held the petition infructuous due to non-appearance by counsel. Writ petition dismissed for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5798 of 2021
Petitioner :- Mohd.Mustkim Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Bhushan Upadhyay,Narendra Deo Upahdayay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
List of fresh cases has been revised. None is present for the petitioner to press the petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents 1 to 4.
We have perused the record.
The prayer in this petition is for a direction upon the respondent authorities to grant license to the petitioner for running a retail meat shop.
It is possible that by efflux of time, this petition has been rendered infructuous and therefore the petitioner's counsel has not appeared.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Order Date :- 22.7.2021.
Rks.
Mohd.Mustkim
State Of U.P.
Manoj Misra
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
