The petitioner claims to be an auction purchaser in the sale conducted by the respondent-bank in accordance with the provision of Rule 9(9) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rule' 2002 framed under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002. The contention is that despite issuance of the sale certificate dated 06.10.2015 and confirmation of the sale, possession of the secured assets has not been handed over to the petitioner. It is then sought to be submitted that the competent Additional District Magistrate had passed an order under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 on 06.05.2017. As far as the remedy availed by the respondent No.5, the original owner, it is admitted that an appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal is pending.