The petitioner argued the writ petition was infructuous and did not wish to press it; the petition was consequently dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4974 of 2021
Petitioner :- Dr. Shailesh Kumar Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jai Krishna Tiwari
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous and, therefore, he does not wish to press the same.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sri J.K. Tiwari, learned counsel, appears for the respondents.
Order Date :- 6.8.2021 sfa/
Dr. Shailesh Kumar Rai
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Manoj Misra
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
