Disposed

M/S Bata India Limited and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Others

Allahabad HC25 Oct 2021WRIC/35540/1998

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the writ petition accepting the mutual settlement agreement between the petitioner employer and the workman respondent. The agreement provided for a full and final financial settlement of Rs. 4 Lakhs, rendering the impugned labour court award non-binding. No further litigation was deemed necessary.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of on the basis of the mutually agreed settlement between the parties.

M/S Bata India Limited and Anr. Vs State of… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35540 of 1998 Petitioner :- M/S Bata India Limited And Anr Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- C.B. Gupta,J.N. Tiwari,S. Chatur Ji Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D.P. Singh,Pradeep Verma Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

¶2

Heard Sri Chandra Bhan Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2-State and Sri D.P. Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.3.

¶3

The petitioners have assailed the impugned award of the learned labour court dated 29.09.1997 passed in favour of respondent No. 3.

¶4

Sri Chandra Bhan Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri D.P. Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.3 submit that both the parties, namely, the petitioner-employer M/s. Bata India Limited and the respondent No. 3-workman/Satish Chandra Srivastava have amicably arrived at a mutually accepted settlement and do not wish to continue the litigation any further. The terms of the settlement are as under:

¶5

I. The M/s Bata India Limited, Shastri Nagar, Sigra, Varanasi has unconditionally agreed to pay a sum of Rs.4 Lakhs to the respondent No. 3- workman/Satish Chandra Srivastava within a period of two months.

¶6

II. The respondent No. 3-workman/Satish Chandra

¶7

Srivastava has agreed to accept the aforesaid amount as a full and final settlement of all dues claimed by him from the petitioners.

¶8

III. The amount of Rs.4 Lakhs shall be deposited by the petitioners in the following bank account at the request of respondent No.3-workman.

¶9

Name- Satish Chandra Srivastava

¶10

Account No.27790100001610

¶11

IFSC-BARB0BHUVAR

¶12

MICR Code 221012011

¶13

Bank of Baroda, B.H.U. Varanasi

¶14

IV. The award shall not be implemented in view of the aforesaid settlement. The respondent No.3workman shall not make any further monetary claim from the petitioner.

¶15

V. In case the petitioner-employer does not deposit the bank draft within a period of two months from today, it shall be open to the respondent No. 3- workman to file a recall application and also institute contempt proceedings, if so advised.

¶16

VI. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the mutually agreed settlement/ compromise.

¶17

Order Date :- 25.10.2021/Ashish Tripathi

M/S Bata India Limited and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Bata India Limited and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Nagar Vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court and 3 Others

Rajendra Kumar Gaur Vs Union of India and Others

M/S S. Gopal Overseas Vs Presiding Officer and 2 Others

Chaudhari Charan Singh University Thru. Its Registrar Vs Presiding Officer,Labour Court and 2 Others

Nagar Nigam Allahabad Thru Municipal Commissioner Vs Employees State Insurance Corp. Ltd. and Another

Asian Professional Security Association and Another Vs Union of India Thru Ministry of Labour and Employment and Anr.