The court disposed of a writ petition filed to direct the Nayab Tehsildar to decide a delayed mutation case. Finding no useful purpose in pending the petition, the court issued a direction for decision within three months.
Direction to Nayab Tehsildar, Deoria to decide the mutation case within three months without unnecessary adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26327 of 2021
Petitioner :- Phoola Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 21.10.2021 Arshad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the Nayab Tehsildar to decide a pending mutation case filed under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006.
Whether the delay in disposal of the mutation case, exceeding three years, disentitles the petitioner from seeking judicial intervention.
Whether the respondent was legally obligated under Rule 34(7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 to decide the case within the prescribed timeframe.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Phoola Devi
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
