This court disposed of a writ petition filed for mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar to decide a pending mutation case within a specified timeframe, relying on the statutory provisions of the U.P. Revenue Code.
Direction to decide Mutation Case No. 00694 of 2021 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23475 of 2021
Petitioner :- Ram Pragat Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
mutation case is not attributable to petitioner. On the aforesaid premise, it is thus urged that interest of justice shall better be served in case a direction is issued to respondent-2, Naib Tehsildar/Tehsildar, Tehsil-Budhanpur, District-Azamgarh to decide above mentioned mutation proceedings within the time period fixed by this Court. Consequently, mandamus as prayed for by petitioner is liable to be issued by this Court.
Order Date :- 9.11.2021 YK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing the Tehsildar to decide a mutation case under Sections 35 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 within the prescribed time period.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ram Pragat
State Of U.P.
Naib Tehsildar/Tehsildar, Tehsil-Budhanpur, District-Azamgarh
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
