The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging an order under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as the petitioner failed to file the Vakalatnama and the order was appealable.
Writ petition disposed on the ground of failure to file Vakalatnama and appealability of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20353 of 2020
Petitioner :- Skahuntla Devi Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Mohan Pandey,Anand Mohan Pandey,Om Prakash Katiyar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
It has been stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed his Vakalatnama in the Registry.
The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition against the order of the Sub Divisional Officer dated 4.11.2019. This order was passed under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
Learned Standing Counsel has opposed the writ petition and has submitted that the order is an appealable one.
Under such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 22.1.2021 PK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dated 4.11.2019, passed under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, was an appealable order warranting dismissal of the writ petition or amenable to writ jurisdiction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Skahuntla Devi
State of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
