Petitioner sought to quash proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code initiated against a third party. Court observed proceedings had begun, rendering writ infructuous, and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18454 of 2020
Petitioner :- Balepanth Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Bhushan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Instructions were filed today by the learned Standing Counsel and it may be kept on record.
A perusal of the instructions shows that the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code has been initiated against the respondent Jitendra Kumar.
Under such circumstances, no further order is required to be passed in the instant writ petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 4.1.2021 Siddhant
Balepanth Prajapati
State Of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
